- COVERT OPERATIONS FILES : Now Expanding Their Covert Operations Worldwide
- Kategori : ÖZEL HARP DAİRESİ & PSİKOLOJİK HARP & BEYAZ VE ÖZEL KUVVETLER & ÖZEL & ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR & FALSE FLAG
Now Expanding Their Covert Operations Worldwide
conventional wars are becoming increasingly harder to sell to the public, U.S.
special operations forces have become the new darling of the military
industrial complex – praised by Congress, White House, and the mainstream
This video is based on the text anlysis entitled “The Expanding Global Footprint of U.S. Special Operations“. It was originally released by SouthFront on February 2, 2019.
With the possible U.S. military withdrawal from Syria in the news on a daily basis, the mainstream media has been quick to parrot the DOD’s claim that 2,000 troops, mostly special operations forces, are to be withdrawn from the country. Although the total number of U.S. special operators deployed to Syria may have approached as many as 5,000, the current headlines have not mentioned that the United States has special operations units deployed not just in Syria, but in a majority of the nations of the world. Over the past seventeen years, the forces at the disposal of U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) have grown exponentially, more than doubling in size in numbers, with a budget that has also expanded four fold in that same period of time.
If U.S. SOF troops do pull out of Syria, they will still have a physical presence in over 70 nations on any given day. Although the public has an often vague and incomplete, unofficial explanation of the reasons behind these deployments, the Pentagon seems totally unwilling to explain the national defense rational or legality of these missions to anyone, including the U.S. Congress or the White House. Not only has SOCOM expanded in numbers, funding and weaponry since 2001 and the advent of the Global War on Terror (GWOT), but has acquired no small amount of political influence as well.
The U.S. special operations forces have become the darling of the military, praised by Congress, the White House, and the Media. They have willingly adopted a mythos that has been formulated and propagated by Hollywood on many levels. The U.S. public seems to worship this new class of soldier, while having little to no understanding of exactly what they do, nor any concept of how their actions might aid or hinder national security. An act has even been proposed by one state Representative to afford special income tax breaks to all SOF members.
Amidst all the praise about their prowess and successes on the battlefield, the media purposefully steers clear of reporting on their many failures. Although the U.S. has built the largest force of special operations in the world, this very fact has arguably proven to have only weakened the U.S. military as a whole. The White House, State Department and Pentagon have increasingly relied on special operations forces to bear the brunt of any and all military operations or covert actions in both acknowledged and secret areas of conflict across the globe. This over-emphasis on special operations as a military solution to all challenges has only weakened traditional, conventional forces.
While most of the public assumes that these new Spartans act to protect U.S. interests and “freedom and democracy” whenever and wherever it is deemed necessary, they have little to no understanding of how the SOF have changed since 2001, nor the increasing military and political influence that they now hold. Even fewer Americans have stopped to ponder the illegality of much of what this expanding military force is doing on a global scale, not to mention the constitutional implications of a new Praetorian class in its midst that is growing in power and influence. If history teaches us anything, it is that shadowy and unaccountable paramilitary forces do not strengthen societies that embrace democratic or constitutional governments.
Expansion of SOF and the Rise of SOCOM
Since the inception of the “Global War on Terror” shortly following September 11, 2001, U.S. SOF have more than doubled from approximately 33,000 to almost 70,000 today. Today, Special Operations Command (SOCOM) has roughly twice the personnel at its disposal, but also four times the budget as it did in 2001. Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), comprising perhaps the most elite and specialized of the SOF forces, numbered some 1,800 in 2001. Although quite secretive in nature, it is surmised by many analysts that JSOC may have grown to the size of SOCOM circa 2001, over the same 18 year period. If realistic, this estimation means that JSOC added its original number of 1,800 men each year, for eighteen years.
reason was given by the U.S. DOD to justify such an expansion in a
traditionally small and highly selective sub-set of conventional military
forces? Special operations forces have existed since at least the Second World
War. All major military powers, and even smaller nations that have not
historically prioritized robust national defense postures, have invested in
special operations forces to complement conventional military establishments.
Special operations units are useful as a significant force multiplier in any
conventional conflict, and are vital in responding to special circumstances
such as anti-terrorism, hostage rescue, reconnaissance deep behind enemy lines,
sabotage, and kill or capture missions.
The Pentagon has argued that terrorism has grown, with the number of internationally recognized terrorist organizations roughly doubling from 2001 to today, mostly due to the explosion of both al Qaeda and ISIS. Regardless of the facts that point to the CIA origins of al Qaeda, there is little argument that the organization has grown in concert with U.S. military intervention in the Middle East and Africa. The same can be said for the origin and spread of ISIS. There is also ample circumstantial evidence to support the theory that the CIA and SOCOM have both directly and indirectly supported both of these terrorist organizations in Syria. Regardless of whether SOCOM is directly or indirectly complicit in aiding the Islamic terrorist organizations it declares it is defending the nation against, there is a clear correlation between the growths of both, and surely SOCOM has benefitted on many levels from this relationship.
The annual declared budget for SOCOM is in the range of $12.3 billion today, up from just $3.1 billion in 2001. There is little doubt that a healthy slice of the annual Overseas Contingency Operations and Support (OCO) budget is consumed by SOCOM, as the organization is the most heavily engaged in operations on foreign soil. In 2018, U.S. Congress approved $67 billion USD for OCO, and a further $7 billion USD in mandatory appropriations. It is unclear how much funding SOCOM receives on an annual basis, as the Pentagon has proven to be largely beyond financial questioning or audit by any office of the civilian government. After failing its first audit in decades in 2018, the Pentagon shrugged off the event with humor, and no one seemed to notice.
SOCOM numbers roughly 70,000 soldiers, marines, airmen and sailors and has a declared budget of at least $12.3 billion USD. To put these numbers in perspective, SOCOM has more personnel than the entire national militaries of 120 of the 193 UN member states. Only 20 nations (including the U.S.) have a greater total defense budget than that of SOCOM. A simple cost benefit analysis would reveal that the U.S. is not making much headway in “winning” the GWOT militarily. The growth of SOCOM has done little to reduce the prevalence of terrorism in the world. It begs the question, is there any correlation at all, or is there another agenda afoot entirely?
Global Reach and Integration
The expansion in numbers and funding of America’s special operations forces is alarming in its own right, but their growing international footprint may be even more alarming. Not only were U.S. SOF deployed to at least 150 nations last year, but they have established professional alliances with national militaries in a majority of those nations. Nick Turse has documented and reported on the growing influence of SOCOM over the past few years, with his articles being widely published in major mainstream periodicals as well as online alternative media. He has established many reliable sources within the SOF community. In regular articles posted on Tom’s Dispatch, Nick has documented the growing influence of SOCOM, its expanding power, and it’s establishing of close ties to the special operations forces of nations across the globe…
MORE PENTAGON NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Pentagon Files
SUPPORT 21WIRE – SUBSCRIBE & BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV
Source (PLS CLICK) : VIDEO : US Now Expanding Their Covert Operations Worldwide
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// VİDEO : Metehan Demir, Mİ°T'in Kenya'da kaçırılan İtalyan kadını kurtarma operasyonunu anlattı
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// Rahim Er : AYŞE !!!!..
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// ÖMÜR ÇELİKDÖNMEZ : Koca Yusuf, İngilizler’i neden korkuttu ! ABD HAARP Gemisi, İstanbul'dan hangi siyasiyi kaçıracak ????
FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS FILES : WHAT IS “FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS” ????
COVERT OPERATIONS FILES /// LE CERCLE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR THE EUREPEAN CONTINENT : CIA, MI6 AND OPUS DEI COVERT POLITICS
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// Sinem Bayram : NELER NELER
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// YASEMİN GÜÇ : Adolf Hitler amca, yaptıkların yinelendi…
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// Yıldıray Oğur : Mutfakta biri mi var ???
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// CIA’den KUBA’ya Firavun Faresi Operasyonu : 21 Eylül 1961
ÖRTÜLÜ OPERASYONLAR DOSYASI /// TANIL BORA : Örtülü Operasyon Örfü ve Münih - Çatlı'nın “Zeki, Çevik ve Güzel Ahlaklı“ Olanı mı ???