By Julianne McKinney, Director


Association of National
Security Alumni


Silver Spring, Maryland


(301) 608-0143 


The prospect of domination of
the nation’s scholars by federal employment, project allocations, and the power
of money is ever present—and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding
scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be
alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become
the captive of a scientific-technological elite.


[President Dwight D.
Eisenhower, January 17, 1961]


Covert actions are
counterproductive and damaging to the national interest of the United States.
They are inimical to the operation of an effective national intelligence
system, and corruptive of civil liberties, including the functioning of the
judiciary and a free press. Most importantly, they contradict the principles of
democracy, national self-determination and international law to which the
United States is publicly committed.


 [Credo of the
Association of National Security Alumni]


Whither the KGB?


In February 1974, Georgetown
University’s Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) hosted
discussions on the plight of dissenters in the Soviet Union, and on the means
by which the U.S. Government might most effectively intervene. Highlights of
these discussions are reported in Understanding the Solzhenitzyn Affair:
Dissent and its Control in the USSR
(CSIS, 1974).


KGB strategies were addressed
in some detail during these discussions. It was noted that the KGB’s success
depended on the extensive use of informant networks and agents provocateurs;
and, following Brezhnev’s rise to power, on the use of drugs and psychiatrists
for further purposes of manipulation and control. Shadowing, bugging,
slandering, blacklisting and other related tactics were also cited as serving
KGB purposes. Participants in the conference agreed that the KGB’s obvious
intent was to divide and isolate the populace, to spread fear, and to silence
dissenters.


Agencies of our own government
are on record as having employed precisely these same tactics on a recurrent
basis. The Church and Rockefeller Committee Hearings in the mid-1970’s
purportedly put an end to these practices. Based on recent developments, it
would appear that the CIA’s and FBI’s Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and Vice-Presidential-level
Hearings) were instead merely driven underground. We are now in contact with a
total of 25* individuals, scattered throughout the United States, who firmly
believe they are being harassed by agencies of the U.S. Government. Others have
been brought to our attention whom we will be contacting in the future. The
majority of these individuals claim that their harassment and surveillance
began in 1989.


The methods reportedly
employed in these harassment campaigns bear a striking resemblance to those
attributed to the CIA and FBI during Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO. The only difference now is that electronic harassment and
experimentation also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.


The Berlin Wall is down,
Communism is in the midst of a death rattle, and the KGB no longer poses the
threat which purportedly served to justify the U.S. Government’s resort to such
operations as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The KGB, since 1989, has been
reduced to an increasingly distant memory.


Reactivation of
surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in this country suggests that
the KGB, as an institution, was never the real threat. A KGB “mentality,” with
its underlying pragmatic contempt for civil liberties, appears, instead, to have
been the driving force behind MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, and the
operations now being reported to us.


The KGB “mentality” is a
matter of personal predilection, not ideology. Its objective is power and
control, regardless of human cost. It is a corrupting, cancerous influence,
which feeds on fear, conformity and government funding.


Four months ago, when this
Project commenced, we approached these complaints of government harassment and
experimentation with an admitted “high degree of caution.” We are no longer
skeptical. The growing numbers of independent complaints and the similarities
between those complaints cannot be ignored. Under the circumstances, the KGB
should be proud of itself. As a “mentality,” the KGB appears to be
accomplishing more in “burying this country” from within, than it could ever
have hoped to have achieved as an institution. It would appear that this
country has a serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.


Part I of this report, which
is reprinted from the June-July 1992 edition of the Association’s publication, Unclassified,
preliminarily addresses the complaints brought to our attention as of July
1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh the legitimacy of those complaints
in terms of the directed-energy technologies reportedly involved. Part II
discusses the overt and covert patterns of harassment identified as a result of
our investigations, to date. A part of our objective, here, is to limit the
success of such operations in the future, by according them widespread
publicity.


In Part II, we do not identify
individuals by name, both to honor their privacy and because our investigations
have not been completed. Part II, like Part I, is a preliminary finding. Our
focus is on the similarities of the complaints being received—similarities
which Federal and State legislators, the courts, the FBI, local law enforcement
agencies, the medical and psychiatric professions, and organizations such as
the ACLU and Amnesty International have so far chosen to ignore.


We frankly find it curious
that more attention and credibility is being accorded purported victims of UFO
experiences and spectral visitations, than to persons who complain of
systematic harassment and experimentation by the U.S. Government, involving
technologies which the U.S. Government is only now grudgingly admitting to
possess. These complaints require investigation. In due course (and provided
financial support is obtained), we hope to be able to acquire the technology
and supportive medical expertise to substantiate the claims being made. We also
hope to alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence can be trusted.
History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise.


PART I – THE PROBLEM SURFACES


[Reprinted from the
June-July 1992 edition of UNCLASSIFIED (Vol. IV, No. 3),


 published by The
Association of National Security Alumni, Washington, D.C.
]


The August-September 1991
issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline University’s Public
Administration
report on the resolution of MKULTRA cases in 1988. Although
the shocking details of medical ethics abuses by the U.S. and Canadian
governments were amply detailed, Washington and Ottawa—citing national security
and government privilege—stalled for so long that the cases never came to
trial. The surviving victims settled for a pittance in an out-of-court
settlement.


Since no individuals or
agencies were held legally accountable, the door was left open for possible
resumption of similar “mind-control” activities.


In the context of that
article, we mentioned briefly that some half-dozen people had contacted us with
appeals for assistance in ending what they believe to be electronic harassment
and mind-control experimentation, possibly involving the CIA. We decided to
take a closer look at this situation.


We are now in touch with
approximately a dozen individuals located throughout the United States who
appear to be targets of harassment and mind-control experimentation involving
directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November 1992, that number had increased
to 25.]


Typically, persons who
complain of being “zapped by radio waves” and of “hearing voices” are
stigmatized as psychotic, delusional or schizophrenic. Being mindful of this,
as well as aware of the treatment accorded UFO and psychic phenomena “freaks,”
we approach this subject with a high degree of caution. Based on our
preliminary investigation, including interviews with the affected individuals,
we conclude that the matter is serious and should be pursued further.


The Existing Directed-Energy
Arsenal


Our first step was to
determine what, if any technology exists which might be used for electronic
harassment. That information was found in a “white paper” published in 1991 by
the U.S. Global Strategy Council—a Washington-based organization, under the
chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who maintains
very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community. The “white paper”
describes the foreign and domestic uses foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic
radiators, infrasound, non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and
high-power microwave emitters.


The term, “non-lethal,” used
to describe this technology is misleading. The energy emitted from all of these
weapons can kill when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of
amplification, they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort and
debilitation.


The Department of Army (DA)
identifies these same weapons as “non-conventional.” They were so identified in
an exhibit at a DA-sponsored symposium on “The Soldier As A System,” in Crystal
City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave incapacitators were separately mentioned
during the symposium as being of particular interest to the U.S. Marine Corps.


We discussed these
“non-conventional” directed-energy weapons with Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of
the exhibit and the Army’s delegate to NATO in matters pertaining to “The
Soldier As A System.” Mr. Shisler acknowledged not only that directed-energy
weapons are in DoD’s arsenal, but also that the American soldier will remain
vulnerable to their effects, should they be employed in the battlefield.


The U.S. Global Strategy
Council recognizes the issue of vulnerability, as well, and urges ongoing
research into effective countermeasures.


Interested readers may want to
send for the U.S. Global Strategy Council’s complete project proposal on this
subject: (Title: Nonlethality: Development of a National Policy and
Employing Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era
, prepared by Janet
Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to unidentified, elusive
“enemies” of the U.S. Government and to the potential domestic applications of
this “non-lethal” technology invite serious consideration by the public at
large.


The Council’s address is 1800
K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, (202) 466-6029.


Bioeffects of Microwave
Radiation


Research into the biological
and psychological effects of exposure to microwave radiation is voluminous. The
U.S. public has been led to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this
research. The fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly
pursued precisely the same research since commencement of Project Pandora in
the 1950’s. The current primary users of this research appear to be the CIA,
DoD, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Energy (DoE).


The Walter Reed Army Institute
of Research (WRAIR) has participated in this research since Project Pandora. In
1973, WRAIR discovered that externally-induced auditory input could be achieved
by means of pulsed microwave audiograms, or analogs of spoken words’ sounds.
The effect on the receiving end is the (schizophrenic) sensation of “hearing
voices” which are not part of the recipients’ own thought processes.


The experiment prompted the
following comment in The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation
of Life,
by Robert O. Becker, M.D., and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow &
Company, NY, 1985): “Such a device has obvious applications in covert
operations designed to drive a target crazy with ‘voices’ or deliver
undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.”


This research has continued,
and the results are published in various publicly available scientific and
technical journals. Interested readers might consult, for example: Lin, James
C., Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems (Plenum Press,
NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of Bioengineering,
University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a number of books and articles
on this subject. [He has more recently informed us that he had designed the
experiment referenced above in Dr. Becker’s book.]


WRAIR has more recently been
studying the biological effects of exposure to high-power microwave radiation.
WRAIR presented a paper on this subject to a DoD-sponsored symposium on “MW
[microwave] Weapons” at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, in
mid-1989.


A matter of interest to us is
why WRAIR should be experimenting with auditory effects of pulsed microwave
audiograms. Also, recent statements by an Army psychiatrist assigned to the
Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest that WRAIR may be experimenting
upon select psychiatric inpatients with microwaves. This, too, is a matter of
interest to us.


Congressional Oversight


The Government’s past record of
abuses in the area of civil rights is well documented. Within the past 30 years
alone, we have witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and
COINTELPRO.


Primarily because of MKULTRA,
MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive Orders and implementing regulations were
published which prohibited military and CIA domestic covert intelligence
operations. Experiments on involuntary human subjects, and the surveillance
of/collection of personal information on U.S. citizens, except under strictly
regulated conditions were also prohibited.


Congressional committees were
created to oversee compliance with these (quasi‑) legal prohibitions. We have
evidence that this is not being done. Moreover, where there are laws and, in
this case, no laws enacted, there are loopholes, as well as individual and
institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the existence of loopholes.
Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent examples. Loopholes are also
found in government resort to “black” intelligence and weapons programs, in the
use of contractors, and in the absence of clear definitions of such terms as
“national security” and “national security risk.”


Executive Orders and
regulations which currently limit official U.S. Intelligence activities do not
extend to non-intelligence government agencies or to their contractors. In
fact, Executive Order 12333 specifies that government contractors do not need
to know that their services support U.S. Intelligence objectives.


In its report of July 8, 1992,
the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management addresses the
problem of tracking funds granted to government-contracted research and
development (R&D) centers. The report notes that the problem is compounded
by DoD’s penchant for creating hard-to-monitor “shell” contractors as
disbursement centers for funding programs.


Neither shell contractors nor
their subcontractors are directly accountable to Congress. Being beyond
Congressional oversight, they have the license to operate as Government
surrogates in intelligence operations about which, “officially” they know
nothing.


In this context, a publication
disseminated at DA’s “The Soldier As A System” symposium noted that the Army’s
Research and Technology Program sponsors 42 laboratories and R&D centers,
employing approximately 10,000 scientists and engineers. The annual budget of
$1.3 billion is only a small part of overall DoD research spending.


Weapons research, which
includes the development and testing of “non-lethal” weapons, is not governed
by laws restricting the activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may
be presumed that these agencies contribute to and benefit from such research.


Preliminary Findings


1.  
   The technology exists for the types of harassment and
experimentation reported to us.


2.     
About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing experiences with
effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.


3.     
U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bioeffects of exposure to microwave
radiation is extensive and continuing.


4.     
The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in mind-control
experimentation; and various agencies of the Government have a record of
circumventing legal restrictions upon their activities.


5.     
Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look closely into “black”
intelligence and weapons procurement programs.


6.     
A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest in testing
directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens under non-clinical/non-controlled
circumstances—DoD, to test ranges and degrees of “non-lethality”; DoE, to
explore “safety” limits; CIA, to test “mind-control” capabilities, and NSA, for
technological refinement. 


PART II – OVERT AND COVERT
HARASSMENT


Since publication of the
preceding article less than four months ago, the association of National
Security Alumni/Electronic Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13*
individuals who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which
coincide with the known effects of
exposure to microwaves,
electromagnetic/radio frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.


The similarity of these
symptoms will be addressed in greater detail in future Project reports. Suffice
it to say, at this point, that the physical and psychological symptoms being
reported to us are consistent with the effects which directed-energy weapons
are designed to produce. Indeed, the numerous afflictions (or “inflictions”)
being reported appear to parallel standard torture “sequelae,”[i][1]
(aftereffects).


Overt Harassment


Overt Harassment—which
obviously is meant to be observed—may be intended to “precondition”
individuals for eventual long-term electronic harassment. Persons terrified by
unexplained overt harassment are not likely to cope with the sudden onset of
electronic harassment in any more reasoned fashion. This phased pattern of
harassment is apparent in all of the cases now being investigated. The fact
that the overt harassment continues in these cases even after the electronic
targeting commences suggests that the objective is to maintain long-term
extremes of stress.


Many of the overt harassment
tactics discussed below are surfacing in cases which (so far) have not
involved discernible forms of electronic harassment. These are cases involving
so-called “whistleblowers” who, because of their inside knowledge of certain
potentially newsworthy events, pose particular threats of embarrassment to the
Government or to government-affiliated employers. We have noticed that
electronic harassment is beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against
persons who try to assist electronic “harassees.” Retaliation suggests loss of
control. Under the circumstances, we are not entirely confident that
“whistleblowers” will continue to be exempted from this type of harassment in
the long term.


The individuals now in touch
with the Project describe their circumstances as involving most, if not all, of
the following overt forms of harassment:


·                
Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of harassment and vandalism
by formerly friendly neighbors.


·                
Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the targeted
individual obtains new, unlisted telephone numbers.


·                
Mail interception, theft and tampering.


·                
Noise campaigns.


While unrelenting harassing
telephone calls might be considered in this context, other tactics are
employed. Blaring horns, whistles, sirens, garbage disposal (run concurrently
in apartment settings, for excessively prolonged periods of time), and
amplified transmissions of recorded “general racket” have been used on a
recurrent basis under circumstances intended to persuade the individual that he
or she is under surveillance.


In all of these cases, the
individuals’ neighbors apparently pretend to be oblivious and/or indifferent to
these sudden, continuous explosions of noise.


Door slamming is also a
popular pastime, particularly in apartment buildings. One individual reported
that, during a peak period of harassment, the neighbor across the hall began
entering and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes, slamming his door loudly
on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence, encompassing periods of several
hours, over a period of several months. It apparently served to trigger a
door-slamming “chain reaction” on the part of neighbors both on that floor and
on the floors immediately above and below. When our contact politely asked her
immediate neighbor to close his door more quietly, he slammed the door in her
face. Prior to commencement of this harassment, that neighbor had apparently
been quite friendly and courteous.


In another case, the primary
door-slammer is an employee of Radix Systems, Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD
contractor engaged in the “super-secret” research and development of some type
of electronic equipment.


Several individuals reported
recurrent, loud, strange noises in their ventilation systems during the
preliminary stages of their harassment. One individual complained of being
recurrently awakened in the middle of the night by the sound of wires being fed
into his (independent) ventilation system. On checking further, he found that a
tubular construction had been built into his vent system which appears to lead
to the apartment upstairs. His upstairs neighbor is employed by the Department
of Justice.


A number of individuals report
that occupants of upstairs and downstairs apartments appear to follow them from
room to room, tapping on the floor or engaging in other activities which appear
intended to advertise an ongoing surveillance.


The Justice Department
employee mentioned above went so far as to offer an unsolicited apology to her
downstairs neighbor for the all-night “pacing about” in her bedroom (in the
event he had happened to notice it). She claimed to be an insomniac. That
pacing-about continued during her recent 36-hour absence from the area. When
our contact politely alerted her to the fact that her apartment had apparently
been entered during her absence, she told him, in effect, to mind his own
business and then immediately complained to the building manager that he was
stalking her.


She conveniently forgot to
inform the building manager that she had assiduously “courted” this individual
for several months, without success; and that she had been stealing his
newspapers on a regular basis. (On one occasion, she handed him a week’s
accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had been left outside the door
of another apartment. Her reason for collecting and saving newspapers which had
not been delivered to her directly is unknown.)


·                
Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers; and comments by
strangers which appear intended to evoke “paranoid” reactions.


In this context, we note that
several individuals have reported confrontations with “homeless” people who, on
closer examination, were found to be fastidiously clean, though garbed in
offbeat fashion (wigs included). The same “eccentric” confronted two of the
individuals in contact with us, at separate distant locations. He is reported
as having feigned mental illness on both occasions, and as having apparently
enjoyed creating a public scene.


·                
Entries into the individual’s residence, during late-night hours while
he/she is sleeping, and/or during the day when the individual is elsewhere.


In virtually all such cases,
the burglars leave evidence of their visits, such as by relocating objects, or
by committing petty and not-so-petty acts of vandalism. In two cases, the
burglar’s “calling card” was to slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled
carcasses inside their locked cages.


In one case, the burglar stole
several pieces of correspondence and left a packet of crack cocaine behind as a
“calling card.” Our contact in this case—an individual who has no criminal
record and no history of experimentation with drugs—is also being harassed
(stalked) by a police officer in her community. One of his recent acts was to
“frame” her with a drug possession charge. After pulling her off the road (a
frequent pastime) and subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so
far), he conveniently managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight feet
away, in front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fingers and
then charged her with Possession. Our contact found the packet of crack cocaine
in her apartment shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling
her case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of evidence with
his own fingerprints. It would appear that someone is interested in correcting
that police officer’s oversight.


In another case, the
individual reports that a tremendous amount of money had been stolen from a
hiding place in her apartment, within hours after she had withdrawn the money
from her bank. There were no obvious signs of entry into her apartment. The
police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce evidence of a crime
worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is not usually stolen.
Documents appear to be the preferred objects of theft, when thefts occur.)


In another case, the burglars
replaced installed lightbulbs with “exploding” bulbs, many of which were Made
in Hungary.
The lightbulbs are now in our possession.


·                
Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive nature.


In two cases of the cases
reported, massive rectal bleeding accompanied the sudden onset of severe
gastrointestinal disturbances. One of these individuals abruptly terminated the
deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on her door.


·                
Sleep disruption/deprivation.


This is achieved by means of
both overt and electronic harassment. Sleep deprivation, as a tactic,
invariably surfaces when the targeted individual begins exhibiting a strong
emotional and irrational response to the other forms of harassment.


·                
Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles.


Vehicles invite peculiarly
ferocious attacks in these harassment campaigns—slashed tires, smashed windows,
oil drainage, oil contamination, destruction of electronic components and
batteries (frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages, often
within range of weapons research facilities and/or other microwave emitters);
and suddenly failed brakes and clutches (possibly involving anti-traction
polymers, which are also in DoD’s “non-lethal” weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto
thefts have also been reported.


Two individuals reported
finding their oil contaminated immediately after having the oil changed by
reputable mechanics. In one of these cases, the oil viscosified (thickened)
while the individual was driving through a remote rural area. Her car ground to
a halt. Getting the “gunk” cleaned out of her engine proved to be an expensive
ordeal. (Viscosification agents are also lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council
as serving “non-lethal” strategic purposes—a topic discussed in Part I of this
publication. Had this woman been assaulted while awaiting help in the said
isolated area, the “non-lethal” attributes of viscosification agents might have
required redefinition.)


Most of those who have
experienced these attacks on a recurring basis have abandoned driving all
together—an objective apparently sought by their tormentors as a means of
increasing their isolation.


·                
Staged accidents.


The majority of those in touch
with us have reported these types of experiences. One individual, for example,
was tailgated at a high rate of speed by two vehicles, while concurrently being
threatened with a gun by one of the vehicles’ occupants. Two others narrowly
avoided what appeared to be deliberately attempted collisions by drivers who
quickly sped away from the scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at
being run off the road. One survived being run off the road in two incidents
within a one-week period, which resulted in “totaling” of her two vehicles.
Another narrowly avoided being crushed into an expressway retaining wall, on
four occasions, by an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same time
frame, being “fried” by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which
subsequently repaired themselves.


It should be noted that, in
some of these cases, “accidental” deaths do occur. One individual in contact
with us reported that his mother drove off a cliff to her death, during a
period when he was researching evidence that a still-respected, high level
State Department official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government
during World War II. The accident occurred shortly after her car had undergone
routine maintenance. She was returning from a dental appointment when the
accident occurred. Witnesses state that it appeared that she had suddenly
stepped on the accelerator before running off the road. The accident served to
terminate this person’s research project.


We are also currently looking
into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who was killed when the
brakes on her tractor failed. We are informed that she had been collecting
affidavits from persons who believe they are the targets of government
harassment and experimentation when her “accident” occurred. We are also
informed that those affidavits have disappeared.


Suicides might also qualify as
“staged accidents,” particularly where “plausibly deniable” government
involvement has been surfaced. We are currently looking into the recent suicide
of a man in Trappe, PA, who, as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA to
intervene in his case. We have copies of that early correspondence. The man, a
former U.S. Army radar technician, had a highly technical and—given the date of
his correspondence—“precocious” grasp of the experimental objectives apparently
being sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence that he had
wanted to believe that the Soviets were conducting these experiments. The FBI
and CIA, of course, did not intervene. We are informed that members of his
family have also been targets of this experimentation.


·                
Isolation of the individual from members of his/her immediate
family—virtually assured when highly focused forms of electronic harassment
commence.


The exception to this is when
elderly parents and young children in the family become targets for apparent
purposes of intimidation. This situation has been reported in eight of our
cases, to date.


One individual (driven to
extremes of stress by ongoing electronic harassment focusing on her children)
killed one child in an effort to protect her from further pain.[ii][2] It
appears that lasers were being used in this individual’s case. The targeting
intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to report the harassment, w
hich
she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored. It became even more deadly when,
in a further show of defiance, she then called the representative of the Iraqi
Government to portray the U.S. Government’s war in the Middle East as
“hypocritical.” She is now hospitalized in a midwestern psychiatric facility,
where, apparently, the experimentation is now continuing.


(That psychiatric facility is
in a State where a disproportionate number of complaints of electronic
harassment are beginning to surface. It is also within range of a U.S. Air
Force base which houses a “super secret” research facility. We are currently
looking into information that spouses and children of persons employed on that
USAF base may be the targets of involuntary experimentation involving
directed-energy weapons technologies.)


Another individual, during a
telephone conversation, was told by an employee of a local power company that,
if she valued the lives of her children, she would drop her public opposition
to the company’s installation of high power lines. Since receiving that threat,
the individual’s 11-year-old daughter has been reduced to extremes of pain,
resulting in her recurrent hospitalization for treatment of illnesses which
cannot be diagnosed. It is now also apparent to this individual that her
three-year-old son is on the receiving end of externally-induced auditory
input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.)


·                
Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by termination of the
individual’s employment, and compounded by expenses associated with the
harassment.


The majority of those now in
contact with the Project—educated, white-collar professionals—have lost their
jobs. Termination of employment in many of these cases involved prefatory
harassment by the employer and co-workers, which coincided with the other overt
forms of harassment discussed above.


The overt harassment tactics
are being described as recurrent, non-sequential and overlapping. As noted
above, the overt harassment continues even after the electronic harassment
commences.


Failure of “Establishment” Support Systems


Those individuals who have
tried to resolve their respective situations through resort to “establishment”
channels have invariably encountered the following:


·                
Apathy, indifference and/or professed helplessness on the part of members
of Congress and state legislators.


·                
Dismissal and/or attempted discrediting by psychiatrists who refuse to
include the terms, “government harassment,” “mind-control experimentation” and
“torture” in their vocabulary.


Several individuals, thinking
that psychiatrists might help to alleviate the extreme stress associated with
their harassment, were accorded “treatment” which clearly pointed to
cooperation between their psychiatrists and members of the U.S. Intelligence
community. One such psychiatrist, in fact, bragged about being a member of the
U.S. Intelligence “inner circle,” informing our contact that her harassment was
a “Pavlovian Experiment,” intended to “break” her.


·                
Lack of interest, courage and/or competency in legal circles.


Few of those in contact with
us have been able to acquire legal assistance—not helped by their straitened
financial circumstances. Most have found that few attorneys are willing to risk
their careers by pursuing cases involving what is believed to be
government-sponsored harassment and experimentation.


A few attorneys reportedly
engaged in egregious violations of codes of professional conduct, in what
appear to have been deliberate efforts at sabotaging our contacts’ cases.
Subsequent attempts by two individuals at obtaining legal redress were met with
stonewalling, obstruction, and high-level denials of wrongdoing.


·                
Refusal of the mass media to address this topic, except in those cases
where suspected experimentees have been driven to the point of committing
murder or suicide.


Such cases (particularly where
an individual has claimed to be the victim of CIA-directed mind-control
involving auditory input) are treated by the press as “curiosities.” An example
of this is the individual who shot a Navy officer outside the Pentagon in
mid-1991.[iii][3]
He claimed to be a victim of CIA mind control, involving auditory input.
According to the press, “he worried ‘about being run over by trains’…” (ref.
incident d
escribed in following paragraph). He is now permanently residing
in a psychiatric facility. He, being institutionalized, and others in the
preliminary stages of his predicament are no longer of interest to the media.


Another recent case which
received short-lived press attention[iv][4] involved a woman diagnosed as having “suffered
from periods of confusion” who climbed over a fence onto a railroad track and
walked into an oncoming train. Because the incident occurred in a community in
which an unusually l
arge number of these mind-control experiments have been
reported, we are looking into the situation. The woman was reportedly “under a
physician’s care” because of her “periods of confusion.” A family member
described the physician to this investigator as “a psychiatrist.” We find that
the alleged “psychiatrist” is a General Practitioner, otherwise non-accredited,
practicing out of his home. We find also that the suicide may have been
witnessed under peculiarly-timed circumstances by an alleged “homeless” person
who has since disappeared. Needless to say, our interest has been whetted.


·                
Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.


The tendency of local police
is to dismiss an individual’s complaints of government harassment as the
ravings of a “fruitcake.” In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one
police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment. Some police agencies,
while acknowledging the reality of the situation, hesitate to intervene in
cases involving what they believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions,
certain police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived
to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absent
a clear mandate to prosecute “stalkers” acting under the aegis of U.S.
Intelligence, the police obviously had their hands tied.


·                
Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our
attention thus far.


FBI spokesmen do acknowledge
that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from
“mentally disturbed persons” who believe that they are being “zapped by radio
waves” and/or “are hearing voices…” “from Mars, that is.”


In one case, an FBI spokesman
reacted in an angry, defensive and bizarre fashion when our contact briefly
alluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance.
(PROJECT SLAMMER is a CIA-funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral
scientist, which explores the “mental make-up” of alleged security risks, along
with their family members and close associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER
include NSA, DIA, and Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)


Until PROJECT SLAMMER was
mentioned, the FBI spokesman’s approach in this case was to politely and
redundantly explain that the law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI’s
intervening in this individual’s case. When she briefly pointed out that the
surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT SLAMMER, the
spokesman’s response was to abruptly and angrily declaim, “You don’t know
who is conducting that surveillance! You don’t know if that is a state
police surveillance! …or a local police surveillance! It could be a totally
unrelated operation! You don’t know who is conducting that surveillance!
[etc., etc.]!”


It was apparent from this
response that the FBI was at least acknowledging the existence of a
surveillance, if in somewhat emotional fashion. The individual in question
subsequently furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it clear
that they are not participants in the surveillance which, based on the
evidence, pointedly suggest that our contact is the target.


·                
Refusal or inability of the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.


Both organizations acknowledge
receiving many complaints from persons claiming to be the targets of some type
of electronic harassment. An ACLU spokes-woman characterized the complaints as
appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints are not being
investigated, she said, because of “limited resources.” We have to wonder, of
course, why the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rights of
prostitutes and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases
such as we are now pursuing.


Amnesty International recently
informed one of our contacts that they could not intervene in her case because
their focus is on the U.S. Government’s treatment of prison inmates. While
incarceration does appear to be one sought-for objective in these
harassment/mind control experiments, we would like to think that protections by
such organizations as Amnesty International can be achieved beforehand.


Related Covert Methodologies


The persons engaged in this
harassment tend to become careless, possibly the result of arrogance born of an
assumption that nobody can stop them. “Harassees” who have noted this
carelessness have furnished us with the following insights into the covert side
of these harassment activities.


·                
Impersonation of military officers.


One individual found that her
next-door neighbor had claimed to be a military intelligence officer, assigned
to a space technology unit in California, on year-long “TDY” (temporary duty)
in the individual’s apartment building. It was subsequently determined that
this alleged officer is not in fact a member of the U.S. Armed Forces; and that
he had used this bogus status to acquire information from a major defense
contractor. Our contact is certain that this person’s apartment was used as a
base of harassment operations.


·                
Use of concealment devices, and emitters detected to date.


Several individuals and
supportive associates report having seen some of the electronic devices being
used in these harassment campaigns.


One saw electronic equipment
concealed inside a false-front upright piano being moved out of her apartment
building. She had previously noted that all of her surrounding neighbors had
identical upright pianos in their apartments, not one of which was ever played.


Other suspected participants
in the harassment may be concealing devices in oversized stereo speakers,
measuring approximately 5′ in height x 3′ x 3′. Several of our contacts have
noted the presence of such speakers in adjacent dwellings.


One individual was told by a
resident of her building that her upstairs neighbor has “microwave ovens” in
his bedroom and livingroom, but none in the kitchen.


Another individual, while
standing outside, looked into her neighbor’s window to find that her bedroom appeared
to be the target of a gray-colored, elongated box-like device, measuring
approximately 1′ in length x 5″ in height (side view). A large,
black-framed lens protruded from the end facing her window. The electrical
cord, if any, was not visible from that vantage point. The equipment was being
operated by a stranger in a three-piece suit, who appeared to be quite startled
to find that he was being observed.


Another was given strong
reason to believe that portable emitters are being concealed in oversized,
extremely heavy, sometimes expandable “briefcases” for use in places of public
assembly, such as meeting halls, auditoriums and restaurants. Smaller varieties
are apparently being used on aircraft.


On one 3-hour flight, our
contact noticed that the man sitting next to her seemed peculiarly intent on
keeping the attaché case on his lap propped open with his fingertips, while he
gazed “blankly” into the distance during the entire flight. She believed that
she was being electronically harassed while on the flight (a common complaint,
in most of the cases now being investigated).


Our contact reports that, when
they prepared to land, the man opened his attaché case to hastily check its
contents, thus disclosing the presence of a raised, built-in “concealment
device” covering the entire bottom surface of the attaché case. The low-slung,
lift-off cover did not appear to be capable of concealing a laptop computer. At
one point during the flight —apparently aware that his “reverie” was inviting
attention, —the man devoted approximately ten minutes to scribbling assorted
entries on a sheet of lined paper, which he had placed on top of his briefcase
two hours previously. He devoted roughly ten minutes to the effort (obviously
preferring a pen to a laptop computer). His attaché case remained ajar during
this process.[v][5]


One individual reports that
mobile emitters may be installed in certain oversized, non-attributable medical
emergency vehicles, possibly for eventual use in civil disturbances. Her
unsuccessful attempts at following the “medical emergency” vehicle which had
surfaced in her case ended with a high-speed chase.


The phony military
intelligence officer, when recently moving out of our contact’s apartment
building, was found to possess a device which resembles an oversized microwave
oven, measuring approximately 4′ in width x 2′ in height x 2 1/2′ in depth. A
subsequent examination of his apartment revealed that he had tapped numerous
additional lines into existing, in-house telephone and TV cables; and that he
had gone to great pains to conceal a major excavation into one wall abutting
the “harassee’s.” Judging from photographs taken immediately after this
person’s departure, the wiring suggests that he was hooked by modem into a
computer network, and that at least some of his electronic equipment was
situated in a large walk-in closet, again abutting the “harassee’s.”


When the alleged officer moved
out, his equipment (except for the oversized “microwave oven”) was packaged in
boxes identifying the contents only as stereo components. During his year-long
residency in this building, no sounds emanated from his apartment to indicate
use of this “stereo” equipment.


·                
Use of modified license plates and vehicle look-alikes.


Some individuals have noted
that their neighbors’ vehicles are periodically replaced (during peak periods
of harassment) by others which qualify as “rough look-alikes.” The tags on
these latter closely resemble those on the homeowners’ vehicles, with a
difference being noted in only one digit or one letter. These modified plates
appear to have been acquired through State DMV channels, thus suggesting
government/intelligence agency involvement.


In one case, where the
individual has obtained police assistance, tracking of one plate surfaced evidence
of a drug connection. That plate rapidly disappeared from the vehicle in
question, to be replaced by another, again bearing a one-letter modification.


·                
Use of neighbors’ residences as bases of operation and training.


One individual recently saw a team
of “technicians” in the house behind hers—a consequence of the team’s failure
to close the curtains and/or dim lighting when puttering around in the kitchen
at 5:00 in the morning. The three men (strangers to this individual, all
stripped down to their T-shirts) behaved as if they were unaware that they were
being watched. Their observer had long suspected that this house was being used
as a base of electronic harassment operations. The harassment had been ongoing
throughout the night.


To provoke a response from
these men, the individual eventually commented aloud on their activities. They
responded immediately by turning the lights off and switching to the use of
flashlights. Why they failed to close the curtains is unknown.


This individual is working
with the police in an effort at ending this surveillance and harassment, with
mixed results.


* * *


Another individual, paying a
surprise visit to the apartment upstairs, overheard one of her own telephone
conversations being played on a tape recorder inside that apartment. Lacking
both a legitimate pretext to enter the apartment and the support of the
building’s management personnel and/or the police, she was prevented from
pursuing this further. Her upstairs neighbor is purportedly employed by Stanford
University Hospital, in Stanford, CA.


The target of surveillance and
harassment in this case is still also trying to recover from the effects
of exposure to potentially lethal doses of radiation, administered in the
1970’s by a dangerously “incompetent” dentist. This might explain the
involvement of alleged Stanford University Hospital personnel in her situation.


The government is on record as
having experimented on unwitting U.S. citizens with radioactive materials
during the 1970’s (and earlier).[vi][6] The House Subcommittee on Energy and
Commerce based their investigation into this matter on a 30-year accumulation
of documents maintained by the Department of Energy. Under the circumstances,
it will come as no surprise if it is ultimately found that DoE has been
involved in this woman’s surveillance and harassment.


* * *


Another individual paid a
surprise visit to the apartment immediately beneath hers, in an attempt to
identify the source of a tremendous racket in her ventilation system. Standing
outside the door, she could hear an individual moving around, a short distance
from the door. She also heard the sound of rustling paper and the steady,
sonar-like “pinging” of some type of electronic device. In response to her
repeated knockings on the door, the person inside simply stopped moving about.
The sound of rustling paper (perhaps a printout of some type) and the steady
“…pin-ng! …pin-ng!” sound continued. The occupant of this apartment resumed
moving about only after it was (incorrectly) believed that our contact had
departed the area. Typically, this situation could not be pursued further.


* * *


All of those who live in
apartment buildings report unusual patterns of occupancy in the apartments
surrounding their own; i.e., upstairs, downstairs and on all sides. They have
become quite convinced—if only because of the highly focused nature of the
symptoms being experienced—that these surrounding apartments are being used as
bases of operation. Perhaps this encirclement facilitates studies of holographic
human telemetries; or perhaps it is intended to increase the prospect of brain
entrainment by electronic means (“entrainment” being one published objective
sought in mind control experiments).[vii][7]


In examining this situation
more closely, a number of individuals have found that surrounding apartments
are either permanently vacant, for unknown reasons, or that they have been
“sub-let” by the original occupants to persons who are purportedly unknown to
the buildings’ management personnel. In one case, the surrounding renters all
list two residences in the local telephone book. Not one lives in the apartment
building in question, though the address is identified as one of the renters’
places of residence. One individual suspects that the original occupants of
apartments surrounding hers have simply been relocated to other apartments in
the same (large) building. Another suspects that an adjacent apartment, which
has been permanently rented to the U.S. Government for use by “visitors” is
also being used as a base of operations.


One individual found that an
immediate neighbor’s housemate has the same (unusual) name of a university
professor who has engaged in extensive research on behalf of the government,
studying the bioeffects of exposure to microwave radiation.


·                
Use of informants/agents provocateurs, frequently members of the
opposite sex.


As noted in the U.S. House of
Representatives Committee on Interior and Insular Affair’s draft report, Alyeska
Pipeline Service Company Covert Operation
(July 1992), the Wackenhut
Corporation’s Special Investigations Division adopted this tactic when pursuing
Alyeska’s critics.


A number of individuals in
touch with us report a range of experiences with new “friends” who—apparently
posing as confidants—used acquired personalia to abruptly end these
“friendships” under deliberately degrading and humiliating circumstances. When
taken in the context of the ongoing surveillances and harassment, these
exercises appear intended to heighten emotional trauma, perhaps to provoke an
uncontrolled response and/or to enforce isolation.


·                
Misuse of covert intelligence personnel (possible former case officers).


One individual, while under
contract to the U.S. Government, properly reported what he believed to be an
approach by a hostile intelligence service. Within a few weeks, alleged U.S.
Intelligence officers contacted this individual. In addition to questioning him
about his background, these alleged intelligence officers asked that he keep in
constant touch with them, particularly when planning to travel.


It soon became apparent that
the alleged intelligence officers were intent only on forcing this individual
to report to them as directed, and to account for his activities. He was not
asked to assist the U.S. Government in any form of intelligence operation; he
was not asked to execute any form of secrecy affirmation statement
acknowledging the classified nature of these meetings; nor was he told why
these meetings—involving a total of seven alleged case officers—were necessary.


When he began to balk at a
continuation of this process, one of his “handlers” conveyed a threat,
suggesting that his continued compliance might be “enforced.” Finally, when
this individual adamantly refused to cooperate further, massive overt harassment
commenced and is currently ongoing.


The operation (clearly
intended to bully this individual into submissive compliance for purposes which
are still unknown) involved crude tactics formerly prized by the KGB.


Whether or not legitimate U.S.
Intelligence case officers were involved in this activity remains to be
determined. Some private firms retain former U.S. Intelligence case officers
for contracting out as “security specialist.” The founder and CEO of one such
firm (Gerald P. Burke, The Parvus Company, Silver Spring, MD) has informed us
that the activities of contract case officers are neither monitored nor subject
to formal restraint.


·                
Use of psychotropic drugs by cooperative physicians.


Shortly after resigning from
the CIA, one of our contacts underwent a range of experiences which suggested
that she had been massively drugged. One of the alleged perpetrators, whom we
have met, alternately claims to be employed by NASA and/or by a firm in Miami,
handling, “microwave equipment.” NASA has no record of this person under the
name furnished.


The “experimentee” ultimately
sought the assistance of a psychiatrist, whom her parents had located as a
referral. The psychiatrist treated her reported “flashbacks” by immediately
placing her on a regimen of Stelazine, which quickly aggravated her condition.
He also made comments to this individual which suggested that he had a
foreknowledge of her situation, and that he was cooperating with U.S.
Intelligence. On one occasion the psychiatrist intimated that our contact might
be employable as an assassin; and he repeatedly urged her to move to Great
Britain where, he said, she would be put in touch with an unidentified Member
of Parliament.


Interestingly, he had a
tremendous computer system in his office suite, which he explained as being
connected by modem into a national level system which, in turn, connected into
private residences. When showing her this equipment, this psychiatrist informed
our contact that she had been “CAT scanned,” pointing out that she was the
subject of the vast series of “A’s” and “B’s” being printed out by one of the
many terminals at his disposal.


Our contact also found that
this psychiatrist kept a military uniform in his closet which bore the rank and
insignia of a three-star general.


The individual ultimately
sought psychiatric support elsewhere. Her new psychiatrist, formerly employed
by DoD, immediately put her on a regimen of Haldol Decanoate, Klonopin and
Benzatropine. The combined effect of these drugs was loss of memory and a state
of mind which, under other circumstances, might be diagnosed as
Depersonalization or Dissociative Disorder. All three drugs proved to be highly
addictive. Our contact, since severing contact with this psychiatrist as well,
has finally successfully overcome the addiction.


* * *


Another individual—the one
whose psychiatrist had informed her of her role in a “Pavlovian Experiment”—was
subjected to attempted drugging by Trazodone, one of the strongest sedatives on
the market. The psychiatrist in question kept no record of the individual’s
outpatient visits, nor of her Trazodone prescriptions. Being unaware that the
individual was not adhering to his regimen, the psychiatrist urged her to
rapidly increase her dosage, renewing her 30-day prescription after a period of
only 11 days.


Though aware of her heart
condition, he failed to monitor her condition, dismissing her complaints of
(electronically-induced) pains in her heart as inconsequential. Trazodone is
known to aggravate heart conditions. Perhaps the intent was to have this
individual succumb to a “heart attack” as the result of “imagined” government
harassment. Neither the appropriate psychiatric society nor the FBI would touch
this case.


* * *


Another individual (a clear
target of retaliation) sought medical assistance to counter sudden massive
headaches and recurrent attacks of vomiting—effects which can be produced by
infrasound. The physician to whom she was referred (an alleged specialist in
Internal Medicine) placed her on a combination of Compazine and Xanax,
prescribing dosages which the Physicians’ Desk Reference warns against.


Compazine, in addition to
being an anti-emetic, is used in the treatment of psychotic disorders. It can
also cause tardive dyskinesia, an irreversible syndrome involving loss of motor
control. Xanax is known to induce vomiting. Both drugs can lead to dependency
and a worsening of the patient’s condition. The effects of all such drugs, in
fact, can be mutated in high-energy fields, thus increasing the likelihood of adverse
reactions.


We have recently found that
this prescribing “physician” is not licensed to practice medicine in the State
in which she has been practicing since at least 1989.


Our contact, being concerned
about the long-term effects of Xanax and Compazine, consulted another physician
in that same office. This physician immediately prescribed Prozac, failing to
concurrently recommend that her patient discontinue the Xanax and Compazine
prescriptions. When our contact refused to take any psychotropic drugs, the
doctor became upset and asked, “Don’t you want to get well?”


This second physician is a
licensed practitioner in Internal Medicine, with no background in Psychiatry.
We have also found that she apparently refers her patients to yet a third
physician in the office who claims to be a psychiatrist. She, too, is licensed
to practice Internal Medicine, only. Her receptionist described this third
physician as having a psychiatric “sub-specialty,” … “as an internist.” The
receptionist also informed us that this internist “is treating a number of
psychiatric patients.”


On pursuing this further, we
find that these physicians are in a small “medical group” which is not listed
by specialty in standard regional telephone directories. The group bears the
same name as one of the CIA’s most infamous recruited physicians (perhaps best
described as “the Mengele of MKULTRA”).


The doctor’s offices are
located in a bank building, which, we have found, is a favored hiding place for
security-oriented businesses and government agencies. Two computer firms,
co-located with an attorney who represents “Island Resort Development, Ltd.,”
are situated immediately beneath the doctors’ offices. The prospect of our
finding island resort developments within 500 miles of this attorney’s office
is limited.


Our contact, being apprised of
these findings, is seeking medical help elsewhere.


* * *


In two of our cases,
urologists took it upon themselves to play the role of “psychiatrist”; i.e.,
they rendered psychiatric diagnoses and prescribed psychotropic drugs. One of
these urologists, employed by The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, prescribed Haldol,
informing our contact that he perceived her to be “psychotic.” His efforts at
getting a Clinic psychiatrist to confirm this diagnosis were unsuccessful. The
psychiatrist, apparently a rare individual who subscribes to codes of medical
ethics, found nothing wrong with this woman, even given the nature of her
complaints. The urologist’s response to this was to issue his own Haldol
prescription. Sensing that something was amiss, the woman refused to have the
prescription filled.


* * *


Yet another individual ended
up in the hands of a psychiatrist who, as a purported means of ending the
stress associated with her harassment, offered to put her under hypnosis. She
described the hypnotic state as “equivalent to floating” and (based on her
overall experiences with this physician) has not ruled out the possibility that
drugs may have been surreptitiously administered. The psychiatrist claimed to
be interested in psychic phenomena and demonstrated an apparently remarkable
ability to read this individual’s mind.


While in her “hypnotic state,
the individual felt a sharp, painful pressure inside her nose, as if something
were being shoved up her nostrils to the sinus cavities. She awoke to find
blood pouring out of her nostrils. The psychiatrist casually dismissed this as
owing to a probable cold.


Shortly after that experience,
the individual began to hear loud tones in her head, followed in due coarse by
auditory input. Brain scans have failed to yield evidence of an implanted
device. (We have recommended that she undergo a scan by means of a suitably
adapted non-linear junction detector, as a preliminary.) Suffice it to say,
this individual has severed contact with the psychiatrist and is continuing to
cope with ongoing overt and electronic harassment by other non-medical means.


·                
Use of medical implant devices.


The situation just described
is not our first encounter with the apparent use of medical implant devices in
these harassment/mind-control cases. Another of our contacts began receiving
auditory input roughly 15 years after she had 4 mm. cochlear implants placed in
her ears. The “voices” claimed to be affiliated with the CIA and, among other
things, expressed intentions of running this woman as an agent in denied areas
by “piggybacking” their audio transmissions onto standard FM frequencies to
avoid detection.


We have been unable to locate
the surgeon who implanted these devices, though we do have a copy of his
operative reports. A recent CAT scan of this individual failed to disclose the
presence of the cochlear implants.


Several years ago, the
individual (now a psychologist) applied for a position with the CIA. She was
interviewed by four Langley-based, purported psychologist, who allegedly
informed her that her job would involve the assessment of certain criminals for
purposes of weighing their prospects for loyalty to this agency.


During these interviews, she
was told to read several books by such persons as Philip Agee, Stansfield
Turner and Ralph McGehee, all of whom were unknown to her. The alleged psychologist
claimed that these authors had described the CIA “as it really is.” Our contact
was not asked to execute a secrecy affirmation statement acknowledging the
classified nature of these proceedings.


The unconventional manner of
this interview process suggests that this individual was being toyed with, for
reasons which remain to be determined. She did not get the job and in fact more
recently lost her job with a state penitentiary. She was fired on the
recommendation of the prison’s psychiatrist, because of her insistence that she
is receiving auditory input from CIA personnel who persist in feeding her
classified information.


Interestingly, though this
individual was deemed unfit to function as a psychologist in the penitentiary
system, the State has rehired her, assigning her to a mental health facility
where, apparently, she is to develop a behavioral modification program for
retarded adults with diagnosed mental illnesses.


This individual claimed to be
receiving and responding to externally-induced auditory “advice” while working
with prison inmates. It may be presumed that the process will continue. Under
the circumstances, we have to wonder if this case qualifies as a benchmark in
mind-control experimentation; i.e., employment of a mind-controlled
psychologist to run the equivalent of mind-control experiments on mentally-ill
retarded adults. We will continue to monitor the situation.


* * *


The individual whom we
previously identified as having challenged a local power company also appears
to have been “tagged” by some type of implant device. During a recent
symposium, she was approached by a man whose business card identifies him as
“Program Manager, Electromagnetic Radiation Division,” DoE. His approach was
suitably sympathetic. Our contact ultimately accepted the man’s invitation to
continue discussing their common ranges of interest in his hotel room. During
this meeting, she accepted the offer of a drink, blacked out after consuming
it, and awoke four hours later, still in this man’s hotel room, to find that
the back of her ear had been punctured and was bleeding. There was no evidence
of a sexual assault. The man glibly evaded this woman’s requests for an
explanation. She has since found two adjacent puncture marks behind her ear,
which are not healing properly, and between which she can feel the presence of
a “wire” measuring approximately 1/4″ in length. We are pursuing this
further.


The said DoE Project Manager
has more recently initiated contact with yet another activist in touch with
this Association. His call was unsolicited. He apparently wanted to know if
this woman would be attending an upcoming conference. We have warned the
individual to avoid any form of private meeting with the said Project Manager.


* * *


To date, we are aware of three
cases involving clandestine behavior on the part of alleged DoE employees. The
CIA figures prominently (if peculiarly) in the majority of our other cases. Two
of those have been discussed above.


In another, also involving
auditory input, the individual is certain that the current Director of Central
Intelligence (DCI) participated in the “voice transmission” process on at least
one occasion. She claims to have recognized his voice. When she commented aloud
on the DCI’s perceived involvement in this experimentation, the “voice”
responded with stuttered and stammered denials. We are told that this
particular “voice” has not been heard from since.


* * *


In yet another case involving
auditory input, the individual has allegedly been informed by her “voices” that
the technologies being used against her were stolen from the CIA by a maverick
employee, whose group is now targeting her from a distance of 2,000 miles. She
reported this to the DCI’s office and was allegedly informed by the Deputy DCI
that she will be awarded millions of dollars if she can produce the equipment
and any of the personnel involved in her harassment.


One unusually-candid CIA
spokesman also allegedly informed this individual that, “while the CIA does not
deny having this equipment,” they “do not use it in this country.” Perhaps this
explains why a number of our contacts have also been electronically harassed
while traveling overseas.


This woman has also been
repeatedly assured by CIA DDS (security) personnel of the Agency’s sincere
concern for her welfare. During a recent telephone conversation with that
Office, we confirmed that she is indeed known to the CIA. Based on this, we
asked that the Agency “put its money where its mouth is,” so to speak, by
conducting a long-term electronic sweep of this individual’s premises. That was
two months ago. No sweep has been conducted, though CIA spokesmen continue to
“sympathize” with her predicament.


* * *


Another individual, a target
of harassment and experimentation since 1952 (apparently singled out because of
his student activism while at Penn State University) began hearing “voices”
after having most of his teeth capped. He has more recently been informed by
his “handlers” that implanted devices are no longer used for purposes of inducing
auditory input. No explanation was offered. He was quite visibly surprised when
informed by this investigator that auditory input can be achieved solely by
means of pulsed microwave audiograms (discussed in Part I of this report).


This individual’s “handlers”
allegedly have also stated that their experiments on U.S. citizens are in
pursuit of a variety of objectives; viz.,


(1) develop an
effective means for creating a perfect, “robotized” soldier;


(2) alter
individual sexual preferences, such as by turning heterosexuals into
homosexuals (they allegedly claim to be having “difficulties” reversing the
process): and


(3) enhance or
destroy levels of academic achievement, at will, such as by degrading the
performance of otherwise brilliant students, and by drastically improving the
performance of poor students.


Given the technology at the
government’s disposal and a predisposition on the part of certain governmental
agencies to “play God” in experimental fashion with citizens’ lives, these
purported projects do not come across as being totally far-fetched.


* * *


Another case involves a woman
whose experiences suggest that she, too, is an MKULTRA experimentee being kept
on the books, so to speak. The woman, apparently a “pet” experimentee, found
herself being introduced to a wide array of prominent individuals whose
connections with the CIA she believed to be quite apparent. One of those she
states, was Robert Jay Lifton, a well-known author and expert on brainwashing,
whose books include The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of
Genocide
(Basic Books, 1986).


Her experiences included a
voluntary (“referral”) admission to Hollywood Hospital, Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada, in 1973, during an era when MKULTRA experiments at the Alan
Memorial Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, were only beginning to
capture the attention of the U.S. Senate.[viii][8]


More recently, in 1990, she
was transported to New York University’s Cameron Medical Center, in
Westchester, NY (under circumstances which qualify as an abduction), where she
was forcibly wrestled to the ground by approximately six Center staffers and
forcibly confined for a period of approximately three weeks. She was neither
psychiatrically counseled nor formally tested while in that facility. The
psychiatrists assigned to her case appeared more intent on forcing her to take
a combination of neuroleptic drugs, to include Haldol, Navane, and Cogentin.
(Haldol and Navane can cause tardive dyskinesia.) She resisted those attempts.


A court ultimately ordered
this woman released from the Center, stipulating that she was not to be
administered drugs. On subsequently acquiring her medical records, under
conditions which prevented censoring or doctoring of those records, she found
that her psychiatrists had planned to inject her with drugs (in defiance of the
court order) on the day of her release. As luck would have it, she was released
a day early.


This woman states also that
she has met Budd Hopkins, of the Intruders Foundation, and that she had a
long-term, confiding relationship with John E. Mack, Professor of Psychiatry,
Harvard Medical School, and founding Director of the Center for Psychological
Studies in the Nuclear Age (previously named, Research Program for the Study of
Human Continuity; and, still previously, rumored to have cooperated with the
CIA in studies of “human ecology”).


At one point in their
relationship, Professor Mack apparently accompanied this woman to a “support group”
meeting of UFO abductees, who, she observed bemusedly, “spent their time
comparing [extraterrestrially] implanted devices.” Professor Mack is on record
as promoting the perception that UFO abductions are legitimate.[ix][9]


We frankly doubt that extraterrestrials
who have a means to commute intergalactically would stoop to implanting
comparatively primitive devices in human beings. However, should it be proved
that the psychiatrist, surgeon and DoE Project Manager discussed above are
extraterrestrials posing as humans, we will be happy to weigh that information.
If it is similarly established that the vehicular “abduction” of the woman
discussed above was the work of an extraterrestrial named Kaplan, who is posing
as a human with Cornell Medical Center connections, we will be happy to ponder
that as well.


In the meantime, it would seem
reasonable that the government would want the public to believe that
extraterrestrial visitations are on the upswing. Mind-altering drugs,
externally-induced auditory input, holographic projections (also a DoD
capability),[x][10] appropriately focused directed-energy targeting, device
implantations, special effects and abductions are all within this government’s
capabilities and can be used for purposes of creating illusi
ons of UFO
experiences. Persons not cognizant of this might be more inclined to fall for
the UFO mythologies now being officially “legitimized.”


* * *


Other cases, possibly
involving U.S. Navy Intelligence, NSA, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and,
peripherally, members of former Soviet Bloc intelligence services will be
discussed in future reports.


Harassment Objectives


In his book, Psychiatry and
the CIA: Victims of Mind Control,
Dr. Harvey Weinstein quotes the following
passage from a book entitled, Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of
Conversion and Brainwashing,
by William Sargant (Greenwood Press, Westport,
CT, 1957):


“By increasing or prolonging
stresses in various ways, or inducing physical debilitation, a more thorough
alteration of the person’s thinking processes may be achieved. …If the stress
or the physical debilitation, or both, are carried one stage further, it may
happen that patterns of thought and behavior, especially those of recent
acquisition, become disrupted. New patterns can then be substituted, or
suppressed patterns allowed to reassert themselves; or the subject may begin to
think or act in ways that precisely contradict his former ones.


“‘…If a complete sudden
collapse can be produced by prolonging or intensifying emotional stress, the
cortical slate may be wiped clean temporarily of its more recently implanted
patterns of behavior, perhaps allowing others to be substituted more easily.’”


Dr. Weinstein then comments:
“The parallel with [Dr. Ewen] Cameron’s theory of differential amnesia is
striking, and the relationship to brainwashing is abundantly clear.”[xi][11]
Dr. Cameron, employed by McGill University’s Allan Memorial Institute in
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, between 1943 and 1964, conducted brainwashing
experiments upo
n select, non-volunteer psychiatric patients on behalf of
the CIA. Dr. Weinstein’s father was one of Cameron’s victims.


Sargant’s theorems and
Cameron’s associated experimental findings appear to be the driving force
behind the harassment and experimentation now being reported to this
Association. All of these individuals are being subjected to a series of
overlapping circumstances which apparently are meant to induce and sustain
long-term extremes of stress. All of these individuals have been effectively isolated.
Unethical psychiatrists and physicians are involved in the majority of these
cases. Mind-altering prescription drugs are being used for clearly
non-therapeutic purposes. Evidence of LSD use is also beginning to surface (one
of Cameron’s favored mind-altering substances). And “psychic driving”
techniques—Cameron’s pet brainwashing method—are involved in all these cases,
to a much greater and more potentially effective degree where auditory input is
involved.


The long-term objectives of
these harassment and experimentation campaigns appear to be quite fundamental;
viz.,


(1) induce a sense of
perverted “loyalty” toward the very agencies engaged in the individual’s
harassment, to confuse his or her priorities where the possibility of obtaining
legal redress might be concerned;


(2) redirect the targeted
individual’s feelings of hopelessness, anger and frustration toward racial and
ethnic groups, and toward select, prominent political figures, to include the
President of the United States; and


(3) force the individual to
commit an act of violence, whether suicide or murder, under conditions which
can be plausibly denied by the government.


An operation’s ultimate
success apparently hangs on this latter objective. We have successfully
obstructed this process in a number of cases now being investigated.


The “Stalker” Phenomenon


In recent weeks, considerable
publicity has been given the trauma suffered by victims of “stalkers” (persons
who obsessively surveil, harass and, in some cases, kill targeted individuals
for assorted, unfathomable reasons). Movie stars who have been stalked
recurrently make the news. Stalking, as a problem, is in fact becoming
widespread, to the point where, in some States, the activity has finally been
specifically proscribed by law.


The individuals in contact
with our Association are reporting the same terrifying ranges of experiences as
are now being reported in the press on behalf of other victims of stalkers. The
only difference in the cases reported to us is that the stalkers operate in
groups over extremely prolong periods of time, and (it would appear) with the
blessing of certain agencies of the U.S. Government. The laws being passed to
protect victims of stalkers are clearly being selectively applied. We hope to
put an end to this situation; that is, in addition to achieving the objectives
discussed above.


It should be noted that the
FBI, though unwilling to intervene in the cases described above recently
intervened on a massive scale to protect Joy Silverman, a Bush-appointed trustee
of the J.F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, from the ardent “stalkings”
of her estranged paramour, Sol Wachtler, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals for
the State of New York.[xii][12]


Wachtler had apparently
threatened to kidnap Silverman’s daughter if not paid $20,000. Since no
kidnapping had occurred, and the case qualified merely as an attempted
extortion, a question arises as to why the New York State Police could not have
handled this investigation. Mrs. Silverman resides in New York.


It would appear that the FBI
devoted more than 100 agents and technicians to the effort, resolving the case
within approximately 30 days. On November 7, 1992, the day of his arrest,
Wachtler ran a gauntlet of 80 FBI special agents on the Long Island Expressway.
Apparently the FBI does not have enough to do, if staking out a lone stalker is
their top priority. We have to wonder, of course, if the FBI’s massive response
was prompted by what was perceived to be Wachtler’s usurpation of governmental
stalking prerogatives.


Mrs. Silverman’s $300,000
donations to Republican Party causes could be considered a basis for the FBI’s
solicitous concern for her welfare. It would appear, under the circumstances,
that the “stalking victims” discussed above—being by now quite
poverty-stricken—should abandon all hope of FBI intervention in their
respective situations. FBI protection appears to have a price tag, which not
one of our contacts can afford.


There can never be any
justification for torture. It creates an escalation of violence in the internal
affairs of states. It spreads like a contagious disease from country to
country. It has lasting effects on the mental and physical health of the victim
and brutalizes the torturer. It is our fundamental duty as human beings to express
what is surely the conscience of humanity and to eradicate this evil.


  


[Amnesty International,
February 1990, in the context of the U.S. Government’s continuing failure to
ratify the U.N. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment, dated December 10, 1984]









 




 











 




 




 




 




 




 




 




 




 




 




 




 




Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

cialis 5 mg viagra satın al Elektronik Sigara https://wwv.stag9000.shop http://umraniyetip.org/anadolu-yakasi/maltepe-escort/ perabet