by Mojmir Babacek


www.globalresearch.ca
– 6 August 2004


The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BAB408B.html


Editors Note:


We bring to our readers this
carefully documented review article by Mojmir Babajek.


While the text deals with a number of
complex scientific processes, the implications of these findings are
far-reaching.


The arsenal of electromagnetic and
informational weapons, used to manipulate the human mind of targeted
individuals or populations, is an integral part of the weapons system of the
New World Order.


The US military possesses a
sophisticated arsenal of psychotronic weapons which could be used both domestically
and internationally.


Electromagnetic and informational
Weapons could be used in conventional wars theatres, without the knowledge of
the enemy.


It is therefore essential that we not
only take cognizance of these findings, but we mobilize nationally and
internationally against the use of brain manipulating technologies.


Michel Chossudovsky, 5 August 2004


In October 2000, Congressman Denis J.
Kucinich introduced in the House of Representatives a bill, which would oblige
the American president to engage in negotiations aimed at the ban of space
based weapons.


In this bill, the definition of a
weapons system included:


“any other unacknowledged or as
yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying,
a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and
economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea- based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic,
laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations
for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such
persons or populations“(15).


As in all legislative acts quoted in
this article, the bill pertains to sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation
of the human brain.


Psychotronic weapons belong, at least
for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere of science
fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments has been
presented in a meaningful way to World public opinion.


That it is feasible to manipulate
human behavior with the use of subliminal, either by sound or visual messages,
is now generally known and acknowledged by the scientific community.


This is why in most countries, the
use of such technologies, without the consent of the individual concerned, is
in theory banned. Needless to say, the use of these technologies is undertaken
covertly, without the knowledge or consent of targeted individuals.


Devices using light for the
stimulation of the brain constitute another mechanism whereby light flashing
under certain frequencies could be used to manipulate the human psychic.


As for the use of sound, a device
transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can be heard only by persons at whom
the beam of sound waves is targeted, has been reported in several news
media.  In this case, the beam is formed
by a combination of sound and ultrasound waves which causes the targeted person
to hear the sound inside his head. Such a procedure could affect the mental
balance of  the targeted individual as
well as convince him that he is, so to speak, mentally ill.


This article examines the development
of technologies and knowledge pertaining to the functioning of the human brain
and the way new methods of manipulation of the human mind are being developed.


Electromagnetic energy


One of the main methods of
manipulation is through electromagnetic energy.


In the declassified scientific
literature only some 30 experiments have been published supporting this
assumption (1),(2). Already in 1974, in the USSR, after successful testing
within a military unit in Novosibirsk, the Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered
with the Government Committee on Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the
USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves (3),
(4), (5).


In the scientific literature,
technical feasibility of inducing sleep in a human being through the use of
radio waves is confirmed in a book by an British scientist involved in research
on the biological effects of electromagnetism (6). A report by the World Health
Organisation (WHO) on nonionizing radiation published in 1991 confirms that:


“many of biological effects
observed in animals exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either
directly or indirectly, with the nervous system…” (2).


Among the published experiments,
there are those where pulsed microwaves have caused the synchronization of
isolated neurons with the frequency of pulsing of microwaves. Ffor example, a
neuron firing at a frequency of 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the
impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. Moreover, the pulsed microwaves contributed to
changing the concentration of neurotransmitters in the brain (neurotransmitters
are a part of the mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain)
and reinforcing or attenuating the effects of drugs delivered into the brain
(1).


The experiment where the main brain
frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of microwave
pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian installation Radioson.
Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the synchronization of the
brain’s activity with the sleep frequency and in this way produce sleep.


Pulsing of microwaves in frequency
predominating in the brain at an awakened state could, by the same procedure,
deny sleep to a human being.


A report derived from the testing
program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute
of Research states


“Microwave pulses appear to
couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to
electric stimulation unrelated to heat”.


In a many times replicated
experiment, microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of
calcium ions from the nerve cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the firing
of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published
this experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of
electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on complex tasks
(7).


Robert Becker, who had share in the
discovery of the effect of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones,
published the excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing
program. In the first part “prompt debilitation effects” should have
been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the experiment by Ross Adey
and others with calcium efflux?


British scientist John Evans, working
in the same field, wrote that both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their
positions and research grants and called them “free-thinking exiles”
(6). In 1975, in the USA, a military experiment was published where pulsed
microwaves produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of
numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince an individual that
it is mentally ill is obvious. The testing program of American Walter Read Army
Institute of Research, where the experiment took place, counts with
“prompt auditory stimulation by means of auditory effects” and
finally aims at “behavior controlled by stimulation” (8).


Let us assume that the words
delivered into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would
not then the subject perceive those same words as his own thoughts?


And would this not imply that that
his behavior was being controlled in this way through the transmission of
ultrasound frequencies? In this regard, the American Air Force 1982 “Final
Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical Systems Through
the Year 2000” states:


“While initial attention should
be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and
electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities
of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied
fields…” (10).


Several scientists have warned that
the latest advances in neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of
the human brain.


In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who
worked on the American Navy’s project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons,
published a scientific article where he states:


“the technical capability to
influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of
the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by
generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members
of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible“ (11).


In 1998, the French National
Bioethics Committee warned that 
“neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing a
potential threat to human rights“ (12). In May 1999 the neuroscientists
conference, sponsored by the UN, took place in Tokyo. Its final declaration
formally acknowledges that :


“Today we have intellectual,
physical and financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and
to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We
wish to profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and
welfare” (13).


On the international political scene,
in the last few years, the concept of remote control of the human brain has
become  a matter of international and
intergovernmental negotiation. In January 1999, the European Parliament passed
a resolution where it called  “for
an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and
deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human
beings.“ (14)


Already in 1997, nine states of the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) addressed the UN, OBSE and the states
of the Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda of the
General Assembly of the United Nations, the preparation and adoption of an
international convention “On Prevention of Informational Wars and
Limitation of Circulation of Informational Weapons” (16), (3).


Informational Weapons


The initiative was originally
proposed, in the Russian State Duma, by Vladimir Lopatin (3). V. Lopatin
worked, from 1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the standing committees on Security
respectively of the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and of the Interparliamentary
Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), specializing in
informational security.(3). The concept of informational weapon or
informational war is rather unknown to the world general public. In 1999, V.
Lopatin, together with Russian scientist Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book
„Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia“ (3). There we find the
explanation of this terminology:


“In the report on the research
of the American Physical Society for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented
that psychophysical weapon systems…can be used… for the construction of a
strategic arm of a new type (informational weapon in informational war)…”


Among many references on this
subject, we refer to Materials of the Parliament Hearings “Threats and
Challenges in the Sphere of Informational Security”, Moscow, July 1996,
“Informational Weapon as a Threat to the National Security of the Russian
Federation” (analytical report of the Intelligence Service of the Russian
Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material “To Whom Will Belong the
Conscientious Weapon in the 21st Century”, Moscow, 1997. (17).


In 2000 V. Lopatin introduced, after
two other authors, the third in order bill on the subject of  “Informational and Psychological
Security of the Russian Federation“. Lopotin’s findings were reviewed by the
Russian newspaper Segodnya:


“…Means of
informational-psychological influence are capable not only of harming the
health of an individual, but, also of causing, according to Lopatin, ‘the
blocking of freedom of will of human being on the subliminal level, the loss of
the ability of political, cultural and social self identification, the
manipulation of societal consciousness, which could lead to   the destruction of a sense of collective
identify by the Russian people and nation’“ (16).


In the book “Psychotronic
Weapons and the Security of Russia”, the authors propose among the basic
principles of the Russian concept of defense against the remote control of the
human psyche not only the acknowledgement of its existence, but also the fact
that the methods of informational and psychotronic war are fully operational
(“and are being used without a formal declaration of war”) (18). They
also quote the record from the session of the Russian Federation’s Federal
Council where V. Lopatin stated that psychotronic weapon can


“cause the blocking of the
freedom of will of a human being on a subliminal level” or
“instillation into the consciousness or subconsciousness of a human being
of information which will trigger a faulty or erroneous perception of
reality” (19).


In that regard, they proposed the
preparation of national legislation as well as the establishment of legal
international norms “aimed at the defense of human psyche against
subliminal, destructive and informational manipulations” (20).


Moreover, they also propose the
declassification of all analytical studies and research on the various
technologies. They warned that, because this research has remained classified
and removed from the public eye, it has allowed the arms race to proceed
unabated. It has thereby contributed to increasing the possibility of
psychotronic war.


Among the possible sources of remote
influence on human psyche, the authors list the “generators of physical
fields“ of “known as well as unknown nature” (21). In 1999 the STOA
(Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate
General for Research of the European Parliament published the report on Crowd
Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in Manchester
(UK) (22,  http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf).


One of four major subjects of the
study pertained  to the so-called
“Second Generation“ or “non lethal” technologies:


“This report evaluates the
second generation of ‘non-lethal’ weapons which are emerging from national
military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the
Clinton Administration’s ‘non-lethal’ warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by
NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy beam,…radio
frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets”
(23) The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control
… technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed
Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest
concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous
system“ (24). The report also states that „perhaps the most powerful
developments remain shrouded in secrecy“ (25).


 The unavailability of official documents
confirming the existence of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA
report is referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet
publication of the author of this article (26  http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf).


Similarly, the internet publication
of the director of the American Human Rights and Anti-mind Control Organization
(CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by the joint initiative of the Quaker
United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, and
Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, with respect to
non-lethal weapons (27).


On September 25th, 2000, the
Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma discussed the addendum to the
article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:


“The achievements of
contemporary science… allow for creation of measured methods of secret, remote
influencing on the psyches and physiology of a person or a group of people“
(28). The committee recommended that the addendum be approved. The addendum to
the article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons“ was approved on
July 26, 2001. It states:


“within the territory of the
Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects…
the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic,
light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…“ (29).


In this way, the Russian government
made a first step to stand up to its dedication to the ban of mind control
technology.


In the Doctrine of Informational
Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September
2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian
Federation, is listed


“the threat to the
constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of
spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness“ and “illegal
use of special means affecting individual, group and societal
consciousness” (30). Among the major directions of the international
cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed
„the ban of production, dissemination and use of ‘informational weapon‘ “ (31).


The foregoing statement should be
interpreted as the continuing Russian commitment to the international ban of
the means of remote influencing of the activity of the human brain.


Similarly, in the above mentioned
report, published by the STOA, the originally proposed version of the
resolution of the European Parliament calls for:


“an international convention for
a global ban on all research and development… which seeks to apply knowledge of
the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human
brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of
human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such
systems.“(32)


Here the term “actual”
might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed.


Among the countries with the most
advanced military technologies is the USA which did not present any international
initiative demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of
human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J. Kucinich was
changed.)


All the same, according to the study
published by STOA, the US is the major promoter of the use of those weapons.
Non lethal technology was included into NATO military doctrine due to their
effort:  “At the initiative of the
USA, within the framework of NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective
use of devices of non-lethal effects” states the record from the session
of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma (28).


The report published by STOA states:
“In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and
their place in allied arsenals” (33). “In 1996 non-lethal tools
identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and
“radio frequency weapons” (34) – those weapons, as was suggested in
the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects on the human
nervous system.


According to the Russian government
informational agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years,U.S. expenditures on the
development and acquisition of the means of informational war has increased
fourfold, and at present they occupy the first place among all military
programs (17),(3).


Though there are possible uses of
informational war, which do not imply mind control, the US Administration  has been unwilling to engage in negotiations
on the ban on all forms of manipulation of the human brain. This unwillingness
might indeed suggest that the US administration intends to use mind control
technologies both within the US as well as internationally as an instrument of
warfare.


One clear consequence of the
continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies
enabling remote control of the human brain is that the governments, who own
such technologies, could use them without having to consult public opinion.
Needless to say, any meaningful democracy in today’s world could be disrupted,
through secret and covert operations.  It
is not inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups subjected to
mind control technologies, could be living in a “fake democracy”
where their own government or a foreign power could broadly shape their
political opinions by means of mind control technologies.


REFERENCES


1) Handbook of Biological Effects of
Electromagnetic Fields, 1996, CRC Press Inc., 0-8493-0641-8/96, – pg. 117, 119,
474- 485, 542-551, 565 at the top and third and last paragraph


2) World Health Organization report
on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg. 143 and 207-208


3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov:
„Psichotronnoje oružie i bezopasnost Rossii“, SINTEG, Russian Federation,
Moscow, ISBN 5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the publications of the
publishing house you will find at the address http://www.sinteg.ru/cataloghead.htm


4) G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov:
„Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam“, Russsian Federation, Moscow,
„Mysteries“, 1993, ISBN 5-86422-098-1


5) With greatest likelihood as well
the Russian daily TRUD, which has organized the search for the documents,
Moscow, between August 1991 and end of 1992 6) John Evans: Mind, Body and
Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press, Cambridge, 1992, ISBN 1874498008,
str.139


7) Robert Becker: “Body
Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life”, William Morrow and
comp., New York, 1985, pg. 287


8) Robert Becker: “Cross
Currents, teh Startling Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on your
Health”, 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0-
7475-0761-9, pg. 304, Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society
Newsletter, January and February 1989


9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves
and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 – 401


10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning:
“Angels Don’t Play This HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology”,
Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN 0-9648812–0-9, pg. 169


11) M. A. Persinger: „On the
Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic
Induction of Fundamental Algorythms“, Perception and Motor Skills, June1995,,
sv. 80, str. 791-799


12) Nature, vol.391,
22.1.1998,str.316, „Advances in Neurosciences May Threaten Human Rights“


13) Internet reference at the site of
the United Nations University and Institute of Advanced Studies in Tokyo does
not work any more, to verify the information it is necessary to find the
document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of neuroscientists in Tokyo, you
may inquire at the address unuias@ias.unu.edu 14) http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1
. click at Plenary sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number –click, choose
1999 and fill in 005 to A4 or search for Resolution on the environment,
security and foreign policy from January 28, 1999


15) http://thomas.loc.gov./
and search for Space Preservation Act then click at H.R.2977


16) Russian daily Segodnya, 11.
February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: „Vsadniki psychotronitscheskovo
apokalypsa” (Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse)


17) See ref. 3), pg. 107


18) See ref. 3) pg. 97


19) See ref. 3), pg. 107


20) See ref. 3), pg. 108


21) See ref. 3) pg. 13


22) http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf


23) see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25


24) see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69


25) see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63,
aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg. XIX or 25, pg. XLV or 61


26) see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69, note
354


27) http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20
CAHRA and Cheryl Welsh are listed at the page 24


28) Document sent by Moscow Committee
of Ecology of Dwellings. Telephone: Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411,
Emilia Tschirkova, directrice


29) Search www.rambler.ru , there
“poisk” (search) and search for “gosudarstvennaja duma”
(State Duma) (it is necessary to type in Russian alphabet), at the page which
appears choose “informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy”
(Informational Channel of the Russian State Duma), there “federalnyje
zakony podpisanyje prezidentom RF” (Federal laws signed by president of
the Russian Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, è. N 103-F3
(July 26, 2001, number N 103- F3) , “O vnesenii dopolnenija v statju 6
federalnogo zakona ob oružii” (addendum to the article 6 of the Federal
law on weapons)


30) Search www.rambler.ru and then
(type in Russian alphabet) “gosudarstvennaja duma”, next
“informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy” (informational channel of
the State Duma), next search by use of “poisk” (search) Doktrina
informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii” “Doctrine of the Informational
Security of the Russian Federation) there see pg. 3 “Vidy informacionnych
ugroz bezopasnosti Rossijskkoj federacii” (Types of Threats to the
Informational Security of the Russian Federation)


31) See ref. 30, pg. 19,
“Mìždunarodnoje sotrudnièestvo Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti obespeèenija
informacionnoj bezopasnoti” (International Cooperation of the Russian
Federation in Assuring the Informational Security”


32) See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33


33) See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61


34) See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62


Mojmir Babacek is the founder of the
International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous
System by Technical Means, http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm.
He is the author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation.


Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

cialis 5 mg viagra satın al Elektronik Sigara https://wwv.stag9000.shop http://umraniyetip.org/anadolu-yakasi/maltepe-escort/ perabet