In its self-righteous zealotry to punish Turkey, German federal
parliament Bundestag passed a resolution on June 2, 2016 recognizing Armenian
“genocide.” The resolution, passed with one vote against and one vote
abstained, worsened an already-strained relationship between Turkey and
But the resolution also had a dark underbelly: It made mockery of
judicial process and history, and exposed racism and double standard.
Potentially it will increase racial strife in German society. It also opened a
Pandora’s box for Germany. Altogether it was a major blunder for the Bundestag.
Why mockery of judicial process? That is because genocide is a
legal term, and according to the 1948 UN “Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,” persons charged with genocide should be
judged by a competent tribunal. That is what Article 6 of the Convention says.
There is no court verdict on Armenian “genocide.”
Cognizant of the UN Convention, the European Court on Human Rights
(ECtHR), in its 2013 and 2015 rulings on the Switzerland-Prince case, noted
that Armenian genocide is disputed among the scholars, and hence not an
established fact. France’s Constitutional Council likewise affirmed in its
ruling on January 8, 2016 that an event cannot be considered genocide unless
established by a competent court. Hence parliaments have no authority to rule
Further, the retroactivity clause (“No punishment without law”)
embedded in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) bars application of
a law to a crime that preceded it. The Convention went into force in 1953.
By its vote, the Bundestag violated international covenants and
judicial rulings. It also violated Germany’s Basic Law (Grundgesetz)
as regards the presumption of innocence and retroactivity.
What about history?
The Bundestag resolution makes sweeping accusations as to the
deportation and “intentional mass killing” of some 1.5 million Armenians by the
Ottoman government. The only “evidence” cited for these accusations are the
works of “independent” researchers and the April 23, 2014 condolences extended
to Armenians by the then-Turkish PM Tayyip Erdoğan.
But who are these “independent researchers?” Presumably mainly the
so-called “International Association of Genocide Scholars,” a biased group that
refuse to debate the issue with their opposing counterparts. Probably also some
Armenian apologists that cropped up in recent years in Turkey – thanks to
support from EU organizations such as the Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
This argument ignores the vast majority of historians, both
Turkish and foreign, that reject the genocide narrative. Among those are the 69
US experts on Turkish, Ottoman and Middle East history, among them the eminent
historian Bernard Lewis, that issued, in 1985, a joint declaration rejecting
the “Armenian genocide” narrative. In 2011 124 Turkish academicians signed a
statement supporting the 1985 declaration.
Does the Bundestag think the opinion of these academicians is
As for referencing Mr. Erdoğan’s condolences, it illustrates how a
well-intentioned declaration by a Turkish leader is abused by Armenians and
their sympathizers toward their ill-founded accusations.
The German lawmakers may have drawn a parallel between the 1915
events and the atrocities (sometimes known as the “First genocide of the 20th
century”) committed by German colonizers against the Namibian natives during
1904-1907. But such parallelism would be baseless. In terms of intent and the
circumstances, the 1915 events in Anatolia and those in 1904-1907 in Namibia
cannot be compared.
German General Bronsart von Schellendorf, who was the deputy to
the War Minister Enver Pasha in World War I, detailed in a 1921 article
published in “Deutsche
Allgemeine Zeitung,” how the armed Armenian guerillas were
cooperating with the advancing Russian army, paralyzing the Ottoman defenses.
Relocation of the Armenian population from the war zone was the only sensible
military recourse. The top military decisions during the war came from Berlin
through General Schellendorf.
Written orders by the central Ottoman government sent to the
provinces leave no doubt that the relocation had no intent to harm the
Armenians. Further, Armenians in the western provinces were exempted from
Compare that to the situation in Namibia where the German
colonizers did not face an invading foreign army, but still decided to wipe out
the native Herero and Nama tribes because the latter had revolted against an
oppressive colonial rule. Enslavement, slave labor and malnutrition were
widespread. Some two thirds of the native population was killed.
And how can the German lawmakers reconcile their “Armenian
genocide” accusation with the fact that Armenians had lived peacefully with the
Ottomans for centuries and occupied high government positions: 22 ministers, 33
parliamentarians, 7 ambassadors, 11 consul generals, 11 university professors,
and many military officers. As late as 1913 the foreign minister in the Ottoman
cabinet was an Armenian.
How many high-ranking Jews were in the Nazi government?
And why would the Ottoman government, if it were intent on
exterminating Armenians, prosecute persons that had committed unlawful acts
against Armenians? The 1915-16 court-martials held by the Ottomans convicted
nearly 1400 persons for disobeying government orders during relocation. The
penalties handed included 63 death sentences.
How does that compare with the treatment by the Nazi government
of, say Waffen-SS, that killed Jews and other “undesirables” during World War
Before passing judgment on history, the German lawmakers should
have at least read for their edification the Manifesto of Hovhannees
Katchaznouni, the first Prime Minister of Armenia, at the Armenian Congress in
Bucharest in 1923, or the March 1, 1920 “note verbal” of Sir Eric Drummond,
Secretary-General of the League of Nations, “that … in Turkey… massacres [were] carried out by irregular bands
who were entirely outside the control of the central Turkish Government.”
A reading of Professor Heath Lowry’s findings on the source of
baseless accusations made by German Protestant missionary Johannes Lepsius, that the lawmakers
use as a reference, would also be very edifying.
Death and sufferings befalling the Armenian side were due to
lawlessness, exposure, disease and famine. Turks have never denied these tragic
events; but calling these events “genocide” is totally baseless.
The German lawmakers should also know that the UN has refused to
recognize the 1915 events as genocide.
The German lawmakers have attempted to show their deep concern for
human loss by citing the plight of as many as 1.5 million Armenians – all
Christian. They went further and included – without citing any evidence – other
Christian minorities in the “mass killings.”
But they also revealed appalling callousness toward the loss of
Muslims during that tragic period.
Separate from the fact that the claim of 1.5 million Armenian
losses during the relocation is a grotesque exaggeration, the parliamentarians
could have shown more credible humanity by expressing some compassion for the
Muslim losses as well. Leaving aside deaths from other causes, and also leaving
aside ethnic cleansing of Muslims in the Balkans during 1912-13, between 1914
and 1914 more than half a million Muslim civilians died at the hands of armed,
marauding Armenian bands. It was horrifying savagery.
Do the German lawmakers think Muslim losses don’t matter?
Expressing compassion for Armenian losses while overlooking the
loss and pain on the Muslim side is outright bigotry. It is, in fact, racism.
If it is any consolation for the Bundestag, such selective
morality is not confined to Germans. It is an affliction that runs deep in the
Just as Pope Francis may have foreshadowed last year while
commemorating the supposed 100th anniversary of Armenian “genocide,” are we at
the dawn of a new, post-modern crusade against the Muslim world? Or is this
another facet of Islamophobia?
In their resolution the German lawmakers give gratuitous advice
Turkey, that it should face its history and resolve its differences with
The lawmakers would have been more convincing in their advice had
they first acknowledged the German guilt in the Namibian atrocities. Although
Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, Germany’s development aid minister, accepted in 2014
German responsibility for the Namibian atrocities, a recognition by the top
German leadership and the German federal parliament is still missing.
It appears that the Bundestag sidestepped the Namibian imbroglio
so as to not to contradict itself. For if the 1915 events were genocide, the
Namibian atrocities would have been indisputably genocide as well. However,
considering the 1948 UN Convention as well as the retroactivity restriction in
law – not to mention ECtHR’s Switzerland-Perinçek rulings – genocide
characterization for the Namibian events would have been inappropriate.
The Bundestag was careful to stay within the international norms.
But if the Bundestag is so scrupulous about the international
norms on the Namibian events, why did it disregard these norms in the case of
the 1915 events? Why such double standard? Turcophobia?
The high-minded German lawmakers should have also admitted the
role their moral clients, the Armenians, played in the Nazi ranks during World
War II. The Nazi-Armenian Legion under the command of General Dro Drastamat
Kanajian, a force of 22,000 to 33,000 men, many of them SS troops, served
Hitler from 1931 to 1945. “Dro” himself was a war criminal from the time he was
a guerrilla leader in eastern Anatolia. So, Armenians are no saints!
Risking domestic peace
Astonishingly enough, the German lawmakers promoted the inclusion
of Armenian “genocide” teaching in school curricula. Noting that so far only
one federal state (Brandenburg) has implemented such curriculum, they argued
for wider implementation.
The lawmakers appear to be oblivious to what that might mean for
domestic peace. There is little doubt that the “genocide” curriculum – apart
from telling a lie – will increase religious and ethnic strife in a country
where there are 3 million ethnic Turks. It may also serve as fodder to the Neo-Nazi
movement. More Möllns, more Solingens, more Turcophobia! Ethnic tensions are
simmering in German society.
In an attempt at magnanimity, the German lawmakers “regretfully”
accepted Germany’ responsibility for the 1915 events. They noted that the
German Empire, an ally of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, did not interfere
with the 1915 events, and apologized to Armenians.
But in so doing, the Bundestag opened a Pandora’s box for Germany
– an unintended consequence.
For if the 1915 events indeed constitute genocide, Germany may be
viewed as a co-conspirator, and liable to pay restitution to Armenians. Since
Germany has no territory to cede to Armenians, and since the Bundestag has
already apologized, that would mean monetary compensation. And a princely sum
Sure enough! True to his reputation, the chief Armenian
lobbyist-in-waiting, Harut Sassounian, jumped on the opportunity. In a June 7,
2016 article published in The California Courier, the lobbyist stated: “Germany
now has to make appropriate amends to Armenians, thus setting a venerable
example for Turkey, not only in recognition, but also in restitution.”
Voila! It remains to be seen how this scenario will unfold. Turks
will be watching in delight.
During the past year the Turkish-German relations reached a low
point – in part due to the migrant crisis, but in part also due to tension
created with Turkish President Erdoğan. The Bundestag undertook the “genocide”
resolution with the intent to punish Turkey.
But the German parliament became carried away when it entered into
territory it should not have. Exceeding its authority, it acted as a tribunal
of law, mocking international norms. It ignored historical facts, while at the
same time exposed racism and double standard. Fuelled by a combination of
Turcophobia and Islamophobia, the resolution had a dark underbelly.
One is tempted to ask: What would the German parliament’s attitude
be if in 1915 the perpetrators were Christian and victims Muslim? A similar
question could be directed to other Western parliaments. To answer this
question, one need not go farther than the recent past: The Srebrenica genocide
and the Khojaly massacre in the 1990s.
Or shall we go some years back and ask what happened to the
Crimean Tatars? History is replete with duplicity.
Considering all, the Bundestag resolution was a disgrace, and
should be rescinded. It should be rescinded if for no reason than to honor
truth. It will in no way help Turkish-German and Turkish-Armenian relations.
Western nations should face their own history before lecturing Turkey.