ARAŞTIRMA DOSYALARI


Background


In April
2009, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) awarded a contract to Corrections
Corporation of America (CCA), which is now known as CoreCivic, Inc.,

to house up to 2,567 low-security, non-U.S. citizen adult male inmates in the
Adams County Correctional Center (Adams County).1 The BOP exercised the
contract’s second of three 2-year option periods in 2015, extending it through
July 2017 and increasing its value to about $468 million. As of June 2016, it
was the third largest Department of Justice (Department or DOJ) contract in
terms of dollars obligated since fiscal year (FY) 2009.


The DOJ
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conducted this audit, covering the period
April 1, 2012, through March 31, 2015, to: (1) assess CoreCivic’s contract
performance; (2) determine whether CoreCivic complied with the terms,
conditions, laws, and regulations applicable to the contract; and (3) assess
the BOP’s formation and administration of the contract. We found that
CoreCivic’s execution of the contract’s requirements did not fully accomplish
the BOP’s program goals in several respects.


In May 2012,
an inmate riot at the facility resulted in a correctional officer’s death and
injuries to approximately 20 staff and inmates. The riot, according to a
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) affidavit, was a consequence of what
inmates perceived to be inadequate medical care, substandard food, and
disrespectful staff members. A BOP after-action report found deficiencies in
staffing levels, staff experience, communication between staff and inmates, and
CoreCivic’s intelligence systems. The report specifically cited the lack of
Spanish-speaking staff and staff inexperience.


Four years
after the riot, we were deeply concerned to find that the facility was plagued
by the same significant deficiencies in correctional and health services and
Spanish-speaking staffing. In 19 of the 38 months following the riot, we found
CoreCivic staffed correctional services at an even lower level than at the time
of the riot in terms of actual post coverage.2 Yet CoreCivic’s monthly reports
to the BOP, which were based on simple headcounts, showed that
correctional staffing levels had improved in 36 of those 38 months. With regard
to Spanish-speaking staff, while the BOP’s post-riot after-action plan
recommended adding to the contract minimum requirements for bilingual staff, we
found that the BOP did not modify the contract to include this requirement
until June 2015,  subsequent to the start of our audit. Moreover, the
contract modification does not define the level of speaking proficiency
required and has no deadline or target date for compliance. As of July 2015,
the facility’s inmate population consisted of approximately 2,300 aliens,
predominately Mexican-nationals, yet only 4 of 367 staff spoke fluent Spanish.
By February 2016, CoreCivic officials told us the number of fluent
Spanish-speaking staff actually dropped to three people, and CoreCivic’s
January 2016 job announcements for correctional officers stated no preference
for bilingual applicants. In addition, the BOP told us that it does not
validate the contractor’s staff for Spanish-speaking skills, and has not
established any validation criteria for doing so.


We also
found lower qualification levels and significantly higher staffing turnover
rates for Adams County correctional officers and believe these factors
contributed to the facility’s lack of experienced staff, which the BOP
identified in its after-action report as a systemic problem in the area of
safety and security at the facility. We reviewed CoreCivic’s hiring practices
and determined the facility employs correctional officers with qualifications
that would have been insufficient for employment at BOP-managed institutions.
For example, the BOP requires entry-level correctional officers to have either
a 4-year college degree or equivalent work experience, while CoreCivic does not
require education beyond high school.


Additionally,
we found significantly higher turnover rates at the facility than those at
comparable BOP institutions and believe it likely results from the
 substantially lower pay and benefits provided by CoreCivic. We found
CoreCivic pays significantly lower wages and offers less time off than the BOP,
and provides fewer career advancement opportunities. For example, the BOP pays
entry-level correctional officers $18.69 per hour, 48 percent higher than the
$12.60 per hour paid by CoreCivic. The State of Mississippi also offers its
correctional officers more generous wages and paid time off than CoreCivic.
Furthermore, the BOP offers new correctional officers noncompetitive promotion
potential to $26.91 an hour, while CoreCivic pays correctional officers,
throughout their careers, only the required prevailing wage rates set forth by
the Department of Labor’s Service Contract Act wage determinations. The BOP’s
contract with CoreCivic does not address either correctional officer
qualification requirements or staff pay and benefits. We believe the BOP should
evaluate the extent to which employee qualification levels and turnover rates
impact safety and security concerns, and whether its contractual terms should
be modified to address those concerns.

In addition, while the BOP’s solicitation that resulted in the Adams County
contract required companies to develop a staffing plan that would illustrate
the

“total number of full-time equivalents (FTE) for each position title,” based on
our discussions with BOP and CoreCivic officials, it became apparent that the
contract was vague about how staffing levels should be calculated. A 2011
contract modification provided that staffing levels should not fall below a monthly
average of 90 percent for Correctional Services and 85 percent for Health
Services of the BOP-approved staffing plan. Both the BOP and CoreCivic
told us they interpreted the contract to allow the calculation of staffing
levels to be based on headcounts rather than FTE, and leave the determination
of day-to-day staff assignments to the discretion of CoreCivic. As a result, we
found the staffing levels CoreCivic reported to the BOP reflected neither
actual staffing at the facility nor staffing insufficiencies.


Specifically,
CoreCivic reported to the BOP simple headcounts of staff recorded on payroll
records, regardless of the hours each employee actually worked. When we
re-calculated correctional services staffing levels based on FTEs using time
and attendance records, we found that, throughout the 4-year period we
reviewed, staffing levels were lower than the levels represented by CoreCivic’s
headcounts and were frequently lower than the BOP’s minimum staffing threshold.
We found similar issues regarding CoreCivic’s reporting of health services
staffing. Because the BOP was unaware of these staffing insufficiencies, it was
unable to assess  the adequacy of staffing levels at the facility. When we
reported these issues and our concerns about them to BOP officials, they told
us CoreCivic’s reporting was consistent with the contract. We found that had
the contract clearly specified that staffing levels should be measured using
FTEs, between July 2011 and July 2015 the BOP could have taken $1,927,307 in
invoice deductions as a result of inadequate correctional and health services
staffing levels. We believe this nearly $2 million that the BOP expended could
have been avoided with more precise contract language and was wasteful.


We also
found that, beginning in December 2012, CoreCivic excluded from its required
staffing reports the status of five critical health services positions
 identified in the approved staffing plan, namely two dentists, two
physicians, and one advanced registered nurse practitioner. As a result, the
BOP, which was not notified of and did not identify the change, was unable to
assess the effect of any vacancies on service provision or invoice amounts. We
believe that this gap in oversight had a negative effect on CoreCivic’s ability
to provide quality health care at the Adams County facility. In fact, we found
that between December 2012 and September 2015, the Adams County facility was
staffed with only a single physician for 434 days (43 percent of the time) and
a single dentist for 689 days (69 percent of the time), resulting in
inmate-to-provider ratios that were about double those specified in BOP program
statements.


Finally, we
found several aspects of the BOP’s control and oversight of the contract
performance to be inadequate. The BOP structured this contract as a
performance-based acquisition, for which the Federal Acquisition Regulation
requires a performance work statement, measurable performance standards, and a

method of assessing contractor performance against those standards. However,
the BOP did not implement appropriate performance standards to measure and

evaluate CoreCivic’s performance. For example, the BOP’s oversight of staffing
levels is limited because the contract requirements do not sufficiently specify
how CoreCivic should measure and report facility staffing levels. We also found
CoreCivic inconsistently used industry-standard dietary guidelines to evaluate
the nutritional adequacy of food service offerings at the facility, an issue
that may have been avoided had the contract specified which standards CoreCivic
should have followed. Additionally, the BOP’s oversight of billings was
inadequate in several ways, resulting in the BOP failing to identify
instances where CoreCivic did not apply mandatory invoice deductions.


In August
2016, the Deputy Attorney General directed the BOP to begin reducing, and
ultimately end, its use of privately operated prisons. Because this order was
issued after the close of our audit period, any analysis of its basis or effect
were outside of this audit’s scope.


This report
makes 9 recommendations to assist the BOP in improving operations under the
Adams County contract and in addressing $42,300 we have identified as
questioned costs.


The Investigation



 Audit of the
Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Contract with CoreCivic, Inc. to Operate the Adams
County Correctional Center in Natchez, Mississippi, December 16, 2016
[73
Pages, 2.3MB]

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir